Case Study · 2024 to Present

Kirro: AI Job Search Assistant

An AI job search platform used across 5+ countries — built on a deliberately unfashionable bet: humans before automation.

Role
Co-Founder & CPO
Timeline
2024 to Present
Markets
US, UK, Canada +
Focus
Tech Professionals
5+
Countries: US, UK, Canada and more
~16%
Interview rate vs 2–3% industry avg
19.8h
Hours saved per user per month
200+
Jobs applied per user monthly

Job hunting hadn't changed in a decade. We rebuilt it around one thing: hours saved.

Tech professionals were losing 10–15 hours a week to applications: tailoring resumes by hand, re-entering the same fields on every platform, tracking it all in spreadsheets, with almost no signal on what was working. Kirro replaces that grind. Upload a resume once, and the platform matches, tailors, applies, and tracks every application for you.

Before Kirro
10–15h/week on applications · Manual tailoring per role · Spreadsheet tracking · 2–3% interview rate
After Kirro
200+ applications monthly, automated · AI-tailored resumes · Full tracking dashboard · ~16% interview rate

Co-founder and CPO. I own product end to end.

My co-founder and I met at Meta and co-founded Kirro together. This case study covers the product side, which I lead end to end: strategy, research, UX, operations, and technical direction.

What I own
Product strategy · Agentic Engineering · User research · Roadmap · Technical direction
How we operate
Human-in-the-loop by design · A team applies on each user's behalf · AI recommends, humans verify · Automation earns trust before it earns autonomy
The Kirro dashboard: personalised job search command centre
Kirro dashboard showing personalized job matches and auto-apply status
79 applications tracked, AI job matches with fit scores, auto-apply active

We launched with humans, not AI. On purpose.

Research with 1,400 job seekers across the US, UK and Canada pointed to one answer: launch with humans, not automation.

01
Volume was the problem, not discovery
Users could find jobs. The repetitive act of applying was what drained them.
02
Human-in-the-loop earned trust before automation did
Users feared bad, automated applications more than they wanted speed. A team of humans applied on their behalf first, with AI assisting behind the scenes.
03
Tech roles were the clearest beachhead
Highest application volume, most consistent formats, a community that refers itself.

"We relied on humans to learn what the automation should eventually do. We weren't being slow. We were being precise."

That hybrid model — a team applying on each user's behalf, guided by AI — paid for itself from day one while teaching us every edge case the automation needed to learn.

The product evolution: from manual to AI-native
PHASE 1 Manual DEP Model Humans apply on behalf of users validate PHASE 2 AI + Human Hybrid AI recommends, humans verify automate PHASE 3 · NOW AI-Native Platform Automated matching and application at scale

Up to 5x the industry's interview rate, at scale.

Kirro now runs across 5+ countries for tech professionals in product, engineering, design and data — applying to 200+ jobs a month per user, automatically.

~16%
Interview rate, vs 2–3% industry average
19.8h
Hours saved per user, monthly
81–87%
AI match score before auto-apply triggers
Applied Jobs: the full tracking dashboard
Kirro applied jobs screen showing 79 applications, 13 interviews, 19.8 hours saved
79 applications, 13 interviews landed (16.5%), 19.8 hours saved — one user account
Building now

From automating applications to an agentic career partner.

The next phase of Kirro moves past automating applications. We're building a fully agentic job search assistant — AI that reasons and acts across a candidate's entire job search, from sourcing and tailoring to interview prep and offer negotiation, with a human always able to step in. That's what we're building right now.